Peter Adriaens wrote me and said: “one of the Thayer's Gulls that I photographed in California is called into question - once more.
It is this bird
.
I hope that at least the photographer (me) is allowed to defend the identification of this bird? It amazes me that people approach identification of Thayer's Gull with extreme caution, yet need just one photograph to dismiss it as a hybrid - which is often even more difficult to identify than the real thing!
I have two more photos of this bird and Kent has put them together here. Note that the upper left photo was taken 2 seconds before the one in upper middle, and the upper right was taken when the bird had landed just 6 seconds after the one in the middle.
Also, I spent almost a full day at Bodega Bay then, together with Steve Howell. We discussed and photographed many of these Thayer's-like birds, and this one was not a problem.
My reasons for identifying this bird as Thayer's Gull as opposed to Glaucous-winged x American Herring Gull were (and still are):
- relatively small size
- thin, parallel-sided bill
- slimmer, more elongated body than other large gulls, with fairly long primary projection
- strong dark peppering on inner primaries (usually absent in GWGU and AHGU, but often seen in 'good' Thayer's Gulls); I have attached a crop of the outer wing so this can be more easily judged (lower left). Note also the obvious white tips to the primary coverts, though I am not sure if these are useful as a character.
- distinct but irregular barring on greater coverts (usually plainer pattern in GWGU and AHGU, especially in the former species)
- full juvenile plumage (in late January)
- frosty, almost whitish appearance of scapulars
To my eyes, nothing seems wrong for Thayer's Gull here, but I am eager to learn so I hope that people who feel that this is more likely a hybrid could somewhat explain their reasons? I suspect it was the apparent bill shape in this photo that seemed wrong, but as anyone who takes photographs of gulls will know, a bill often looks heavier than in reality when turned away from the camera. In addition, note that the bird holds its bill slightly open in flight, adding to the heavy impression in the photo.
Anyway, I hope this explains things a bit.
Best wishes
Peter”
Thursday, 26 April 2012
Thursday, 19 April 2012
The Danish gull versus a Thayer's from Ontario in Canada
Few people keep arguing that something is wrong with the Danish bird without being able to specify what is actually wrong. Brandon Holden has some very nice gull photos here and he says in the GRO forum that there is something wrong with the appearance. I have taken the liberty to use some of his great photos of a Thayer’s from Ontario in Canada put up against the Danish bird for comparison.
.
People have criticised the head and bill shape. However, where comparing with these gulls Ontario, Ontario, Ontario, Ontario, Minesota, Nevada, Japan, Califonia, Califonia, Califonia, Califonia, Califonia, Lake Michigan, Newfoundland, British Colombia, Oregon, Japan, Japan og Norway I see so many similarities with the Danish gull here, here and here. Please note hove the head shape changes with behaviour, i.e. the flat forehead seen when it was feeding among Great Black-backed Gulls vanished when it landed on the nearby roof.
For additional comparison look at figure 6 in this paper on plumage development in captive Thayer’s chicks caught on Victoria Island in Arctic Canada. What a massive bill and flat forehead.
Kirk Zufelt has written two blog posts on size variation in Thayer's Gull part 1 and part 2 based on experiences from eastern Lake Superior in Ontario. He says that: ‘Thayer's Gull is thought of by many as a relatively finely structured gull with a rounder head and finer bill than the Herring. Indeed the females are usually structured in this fashion. This however is not a diagnostic field mark at all. The male Thayer's can be quite robust and to my eye are near indistinguishable from the Herring Gull by structure. In fact many male Thayer's are much more robust and "Herring Gull-like" in structure than the female Herrings. In the field I look closely at all the round headed petite look birds with most of them ending up being Herrings. The bottom line is the structure is a good way to narrow down the field but it is far from diagnostic’.
The pale eye ring has also been discussed, but again that character is also seen in other Thayer’s Gulls such as these from Lake Michigan, Califonia, California, Minesota, Ontario, Ireland, British Colombia and Ontario
I would be very interested if anybody could break down the Danish bird in a detailed analysis.
Thayer’s Gull: from top left to right bottom: 1) Denmark Kent Olsen; 2) Canada Brandon Holden; 3) Denmark Kent Olsen; 4) Canada Brandon Holden; 5) Denmark Kent Olsen; 6) Denmark Kent Olsen. |
Thayer’s Gull: from top left to right bottom: 1) Canada Brandon Holden; 2) Denmark Kent Olsen; 3) Denmark Kent Olsen. |
People have criticised the head and bill shape. However, where comparing with these gulls Ontario, Ontario, Ontario, Ontario, Minesota, Nevada, Japan, Califonia, Califonia, Califonia, Califonia, Califonia, Lake Michigan, Newfoundland, British Colombia, Oregon, Japan, Japan og Norway I see so many similarities with the Danish gull here, here and here. Please note hove the head shape changes with behaviour, i.e. the flat forehead seen when it was feeding among Great Black-backed Gulls vanished when it landed on the nearby roof.
For additional comparison look at figure 6 in this paper on plumage development in captive Thayer’s chicks caught on Victoria Island in Arctic Canada. What a massive bill and flat forehead.
Kirk Zufelt has written two blog posts on size variation in Thayer's Gull part 1 and part 2 based on experiences from eastern Lake Superior in Ontario. He says that: ‘Thayer's Gull is thought of by many as a relatively finely structured gull with a rounder head and finer bill than the Herring. Indeed the females are usually structured in this fashion. This however is not a diagnostic field mark at all. The male Thayer's can be quite robust and to my eye are near indistinguishable from the Herring Gull by structure. In fact many male Thayer's are much more robust and "Herring Gull-like" in structure than the female Herrings. In the field I look closely at all the round headed petite look birds with most of them ending up being Herrings. The bottom line is the structure is a good way to narrow down the field but it is far from diagnostic’.
The pale eye ring has also been discussed, but again that character is also seen in other Thayer’s Gulls such as these from Lake Michigan, Califonia, California, Minesota, Ontario, Ireland, British Colombia and Ontario
I would be very interested if anybody could break down the Danish bird in a detailed analysis.
Tuesday, 17 April 2012
Thayer's Gull with focus on primary projection
It seemed as if the Danish gull had been discussed in almost every possible detail, but now some people have once again returned to the hybrid speculations mainly due to the similarities between the Danish gull and the Nelson’s Gull in this and this photo posted on Larusology.
.
There are some similarities between that Nelson's Gull and the Danish bird. However, as Peter Adriaens says: ‘there are also some clear differences, not just in size and shape or bill pattern, but also in plumage.
There are subtle differences in the general colour of the plumage, pattern of tertials, shape of the lower scapulars, etc, but I think the most obvious differences are:
1) Bright pink bill, quite like Glaucous Gull (clearly duller in the Danish bird);
2) Short primary projection, again like Glaucous Gull. Note the difference in primary spacing in the composite with the Danish bird and that Nelson's Gull as an inset.
3) Primary pattern. In the Danish bird, P6-10 have dark outer webs, and P4-5 have distinct dark subterminal spots. In that Nelson's Gull, only P7-10 have dark outer webs, and only P5-6 have distinct dark subterminal spots. So I would say that this Nelson's Gull is only a superficial match for the Danish bird. When you study the details, the two are quite different”.
Note the difference in primary spacing in the composite with the Danish bird and that Nelson's Gull insertet in the corner.
|
There are some similarities between that Nelson's Gull and the Danish bird. However, as Peter Adriaens says: ‘there are also some clear differences, not just in size and shape or bill pattern, but also in plumage.
There are subtle differences in the general colour of the plumage, pattern of tertials, shape of the lower scapulars, etc, but I think the most obvious differences are:
1) Bright pink bill, quite like Glaucous Gull (clearly duller in the Danish bird);
2) Short primary projection, again like Glaucous Gull. Note the difference in primary spacing in the composite with the Danish bird and that Nelson's Gull as an inset.
3) Primary pattern. In the Danish bird, P6-10 have dark outer webs, and P4-5 have distinct dark subterminal spots. In that Nelson's Gull, only P7-10 have dark outer webs, and only P5-6 have distinct dark subterminal spots. So I would say that this Nelson's Gull is only a superficial match for the Danish bird. When you study the details, the two are quite different”.
Wednesday, 11 April 2012
Thayer's Gull in close-ups that illustrate the finer details
It has been stated many times before, but I’ll do it again. When evaluating jizz one should always remember that single situation photos will not always do a bird justice. It is always best to make a judgement based on multiple photos capturing different posture/behaviour/situations if at all possible.
Several have stated that head profile in the Danish gull is very herring gull-like and head size is relatively large. Even though this is certainly not uncommon in male Thayer’s Gull it has provoked doubt and fuelled hybrid speculations among birders who live in hybrid hotspots such as the US West Coast where hybrids plumage-wise almost make a complete match with the wintering Thayer’s and where people are left with size, proportions and jizz to make a safe ID.
I have trouble understanding that even though so many experienced gull watchers have joined this discussion the main argue against the Danish gull being a Thayer’s is size and proportions of especially head and bill. I expect we all have experience with gulls changing appearance in relation to behaviour and posture.
For comparison I have posted two photos of an Iceland Gull feeding in the same place in the container just few minutes before. It was normal round headed when walking in safe distance; however, when it joined the feeding frenzy is suddenly transformed into a large-headed bird with flat forehead. It was striking how the appearance and jizz changed, especially the impression that the head suddenly appeared much larger relative to the body when the bird feed.
I’m not stating the Danish gull transformed into a small petit female, but the relative large headed appearance certainly changed. When watching the gull on the roof I actually had to view my camera display for finer details to make sure it was the same gull. I acknowledge that proportions and size strongly indicates that it is a male, but I believe that the scary appearance is also caused by an artefact created by posture and behaviour and possibly also the telephoto effect induced by my Canon 500 mm lens.
I might be wrong, and then please refresh my memory, but in my humble opinion there are no plumage characters which actually directly speak against Thayer’s. All plumage characters that people have found not supportive of Thayer’s have been matched in other Thayer's Gulls with safe ID.
People have e.g. argued that the outer tail feathers and the details in the venetian blind in the primaries is not pro Thayer’s. Therefore I have also collected wing and tail shot. I don’t see any difference in these characters compared with several examples of Thayer’s photographed away from the hybrid hotspots.
I completely acknowledge that people living in a hybrid hotspot use a very restricted view on what a true Thayer’s look like and due to scary hybrids feel that they are mostly left with size, proportions and jizz to make a safe ID. However, 'the swarm of hybrids on the American west coast is mostly a local problem, not a worldwide one' as stated by Peter Adriaens.
Several have stated that head profile in the Danish gull is very herring gull-like and head size is relatively large. Even though this is certainly not uncommon in male Thayer’s Gull it has provoked doubt and fuelled hybrid speculations among birders who live in hybrid hotspots such as the US West Coast where hybrids plumage-wise almost make a complete match with the wintering Thayer’s and where people are left with size, proportions and jizz to make a safe ID.
I have trouble understanding that even though so many experienced gull watchers have joined this discussion the main argue against the Danish gull being a Thayer’s is size and proportions of especially head and bill. I expect we all have experience with gulls changing appearance in relation to behaviour and posture.
For comparison I have posted two photos of an Iceland Gull feeding in the same place in the container just few minutes before. It was normal round headed when walking in safe distance; however, when it joined the feeding frenzy is suddenly transformed into a large-headed bird with flat forehead. It was striking how the appearance and jizz changed, especially the impression that the head suddenly appeared much larger relative to the body when the bird feed.
I’m not stating the Danish gull transformed into a small petit female, but the relative large headed appearance certainly changed. When watching the gull on the roof I actually had to view my camera display for finer details to make sure it was the same gull. I acknowledge that proportions and size strongly indicates that it is a male, but I believe that the scary appearance is also caused by an artefact created by posture and behaviour and possibly also the telephoto effect induced by my Canon 500 mm lens.
I might be wrong, and then please refresh my memory, but in my humble opinion there are no plumage characters which actually directly speak against Thayer’s. All plumage characters that people have found not supportive of Thayer’s have been matched in other Thayer's Gulls with safe ID.
People have e.g. argued that the outer tail feathers and the details in the venetian blind in the primaries is not pro Thayer’s. Therefore I have also collected wing and tail shot. I don’t see any difference in these characters compared with several examples of Thayer’s photographed away from the hybrid hotspots.
I completely acknowledge that people living in a hybrid hotspot use a very restricted view on what a true Thayer’s look like and due to scary hybrids feel that they are mostly left with size, proportions and jizz to make a safe ID. However, 'the swarm of hybrids on the American west coast is mostly a local problem, not a worldwide one' as stated by Peter Adriaens.
Thursday, 5 April 2012
Thayer's Gull in direct comparison with other Thayer's Gulls
Here it’s possible to evaluate the Danish gull in direct comparison with Thayer’s Gull from California and Japan. All the photos used in the collages are also posted in larger versions below. Remember to click on the photos to see them in large versions.
Thayer’s Gull overall macro view: all photos: Denmark 4.2.2012 Kent Olsen. |
Point Reyes, California 27.1.2011 Peter Adriaens |
California December Hans Larsson |
California December Hans Larsson |
Point Reyes, California 27.1.2011 Peter Adriaens |
Hvide Sande Harbour, Denmark 4.2.2012 Kent Olsen |
Point Reyes, California 27.1.2011 Peter Adriaens |
Bodega Bay, California 28.1.2011 Peter Adriaens |
Choshi, Japan 13.3.2012 Peter Adriaens |
Pillar Point, California 22.1.2011 Peter Adriaens |
Pillar Point, California 22.1.2011 Peter Adriaens |
California December Hans Larsson |
California December Hans Larsson |
California December Hans Larsson |
Hvide Sande Harbour, Denmark 4.2.2012 Kent Olsen |
Bodega Bay, California 27.1.2011 Peter Adriaens |
Bodega Bay, California 27.1.2011 Peter Adriaens |
Half Moon Bay, California 19.1.2011 Peter Adriaens |
Monterey, California 1.2.2011 Peter Adriaens |
Petaluma, California 25.1.2011 Peter Adriaens |
Hvide Sande Harbour, Denmark 4.2.2012 Kent Olsen |
Hvide Sande Harbour, Denmark 4.2.2012 Kent Olsen |
Bodega Bay, California 27.1.2011 Peter Adriaens |
Bodega Bay, California 27.1.2011 Peter Adriaens |
Bodega Bay, California 28.1.2011 Peter Adriaens |
California December Hans Larsson |
California December Hans Larsson |
Bodega Bay, California 27.1.2011 Peter Adriaens |
Bodega Bay, California 27.1.2011 Peter Adriaens |
Hvide Sande Harbour, Denmark 4.2.2012 Kent Olsen |
Hvide Sande Harbour, Denmark 4.2.2012 Kent Olsen |
Hvide Sande Harbour, Denmark 4.2.2012 Kent Olsen |
Hvide Sande Harbour, Denmark 4.2.2012 Kent Olsen |
Hvide Sande Harbour, Denmark 4.2.2012 Kent Olsen |
Hvide Sande Harbour, Denmark 4.2.2012 Kent Olsen |
Hvide Sande Harbour, Denmark 4.2.2012 Kent Olsen |
Hvide Sande Harbour, Denmark 4.2.2012 Kent Olsen |
Hvide Sande Harbour, Denmark 4.2.2012 Kent Olsen |
Monterey Bay, California 1.2.2011 Peter Adriaens |
Half Moon Bay, California 19.1.2011 Peter Adriaens |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)